> Opinion > Perspective
Two Different views looking at the Tibet-China IssueA Collision Would never cease Unless Two countries adhere their standpoint
Kim Sung-soo  |  hjournal@hanyang.ac.kr
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
[301호] 승인 2008.05.30  
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn

   

Kim Sung-soo

Department of Political Science and Diplomacy, Hanyang University

On the eve of the Beijing Olympics, the bloody rally by the Tibetans in Lhasa, calling for their independence is still rippling two months later.  The Chinese government, which repressed the Tibetans by force, is now giving all they have to quell domestic and international wavering by calling the incident "the machinations by the Dalai Lama and anti-Chinese forces to disrupt the opening of the Olympics." However, in spite of China's efforts, the international community's interest in the Tibet affair is rising especially after the disruption of the flame event in France. In April, England announced that they would not participate in the openings in response to the oppression of Tibetan human rights by China. Other voices of criticism by the Western world were aimed at China for their oppression of human rights and blind patriotism. In the midst of China and the Dalai Lama up against each other over the Tibet incident, both sides are also showing opposite measures to overcome the situation. China dubs the Tibet issue as a "domestic" one and claims that no other country has the jurisdiction to meddle in China? sovereign affairs. On the other hand, the Dalai Lama is making it an international issue and is looking for a international action to resolve it.

 

China's Impossible Assimilation Policy Towards Tibet

China, which is denouncing the interference of the global community regarding the Tibet issue, deems the said issue the starting point of a national break up of China. As it is well known, China is a nation with an overwhelming majority of the Han race and 55 other ethnic minorities. This multi-national and multi-cultural characteristic of China forced the country to think about what kind of nationalism it was to develop in order for national unity and development regarding ethnic minorities. In other words, China had been enforcing a two-track policy that at the same time would guarantee ethnic self-government and culture and close all movements for independence.

In light of this, you can say that the Tibet incident was affected by the strong assimilation policy directed by China for the last ten years. After conquering Tibet with military force in 1950 and destroying the independence movement of 1959, the Chinese Government has been undermining Tibet's identity and has tried numerous methods to assimilate Tibet into China. A good example would be the attempts to estrange the Dalai Lama, Tibet's spiritual leader, and the monks who are its social leaders. For the last ten years, the Chinese government has tried to force the monks to deny the Dalai Lama and prohibited believers to pray for the Dalai Lama. However, in light of the fact that Buddhism holds an undisputed position in Tibet's life and culture, the failure of these policies were already foreshadowed. Tibet's society, including politics, economics, history, and even culture, are sustained by the religion's power and authority. It would not be far-fetched to say that the reason Tibetans stayed together to the very end even when China attacked and took away their independence was because of their religious faith. The impossible migration forced by the Hans on the Tibetans caused national conflict in Tibet? society. In effect, China? polices towards Tibet could be the reason for the Tibet incident.

 

   
A group of Chineses who advocate assimilation policy of the Chinese government

 

Using the Beijing Olympics to Internationalize the Tibet Problem

On the other hand, Tibet's active efforts towards the international community could be another perspective on this issue. The Tibet problem first became an active cause in the international community when President Clinton visited China for nine days in 1998. That was the first time the Tibet issue was openly discussed between the US and China. Although the discussions by the heads of state were terminated before the point where the relationship between the two countries would have been damaged, it was an important point for the Tibet issue to become sensitive for the international community.  It was not that the Tibet issue did not attract attention from the international community before, but the rapid growth of China prevented Western nations from interfering and it was difficult to foresee the Tibet issue becoming internationally acknowledged.

Another reason why the Tibet issue became an international problem is due to the international efforts of the Dalai Lama exiled government. The Dalai Lama, along with internationalizing Tibet's national  independence, has actively participated in efforts for human rights, anti-nuclear, environmental security, and other international issues, hence promoting his international standing. These efforts by the Dalai Lama enabled Western society to justify their interference in the Tibet issue. It is easy to read the Dalai Lama? exiled government? purposes regarding their use of the Beijing Olympics as an opportunity to break out. If Tibet's exiled government's best choice, pitted against China's strategy of denying the Dalai Lama and, by doing so, destroying the centripetal force of the independence movement, is to internationalize the Tibet problem, the Beijing Olympics where the whole world would get together, would be a marvelous stage to do it.

It is anybody's guess as to how the Tibetan's rage, built up over decades of oppression, will develop. As Tibetans from all over the world participated in this rally, it is as yet uncertain how this incident will progress as China is still showing signs of aggressive repression. If China regards the Tibet issue as an ethnic conflict with the possibility of a national split, hence non-negotiable, and the Tibetan exiled government refuses to give up their efforts for independence, it is always possible for another physical and bloody incident.

Translated by Lee Shin-young

 

This contribution may have a different standpoint from the Hanyang Journal's.

폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn 뒤로가기 위로가기
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
자동등록방지용 코드를 입력하세요!   
확인
- 200자까지 쓰실 수 있습니다. (현재 0 byte / 최대 400byte)
- 욕설등 인신공격성 글은 삭제 합니다. [운영원칙]
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
최근인기기사
1
HYU branD-Design Contest : Promoting HYU’s Brand Value
2
The Reasons Why Students Never Vote
3
Korean Universities Facing Unavoidable Challenges of Quota Diet in 2020
4
Traditional Markets Take Visitors Back in Time
5
Integration of Google’s ‘G-Suite’ into Hanyang Mail
6
Tattooist ʻLegalizationʼ Movement
7
Sajaegi , a Blemish on K-pop Charts’ Credibility
8
We’re All Traveling Through Time
9
Brand New Payment Method: Shinhan Card Face Pay
10
New E-Learning Contents Available for Students
About HJSubscriptionTo HJFree BoardContact UsPrivacy PolicyYouth Protection Policy
Executive Editor Professor Yun Seong-won | Editor-in-Chief Lee Jung-joo Youth Protection Officer : Lee Jung-joo
Seoul Campus, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Rep. of KOREA | Tel_02 2220 4774
Ansan Campus, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan Kyeonggi-do, 426-791, Korea
Copyright © 2007 The Hanyang Journal. All rights reserved.