> Opinion > Perspective
Infringement or Development?ANALYSIS
By Kang Hae-ryung  |  kgiggs@hanyang.ac.kr
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
[307호] 승인 2010.03.02  
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn
   Animal testing is one of the processes for developing scientific techniques such as producing new drugs or developing new medical technologies. Animal testing is widely known to have begun with Aristotle? experiments. Nowadays, in the pharmaceutical world, animal testing is an essential process before clinical trials on patients. However, the controversy surrounding animal testing still remains. Some people think that the animal testing was an important role to invent various vaccines, while other people have opposite views. For instance, one of the reasons why they disagree is that there is no effectiveness because human beings and animals have only 1.2 percent of same kinds of diseases. They also think that the animal testing just infringes the rights of animals. 
Between the development of techniques and infringement of animals?rights, there were various discussions about the legitimacy of animal testing. What are Hanyangians?opinions about the animal testing?
   According to the 195 Hanyangians who were surveyed at both Seoul and ERICA Campus, 66.1 percent of the respondents were interested in animal testing, 71.6 percent of them got information about animal testing from the Internet and mass media, and 6.6 percent of respondents had experience experimenting on animals. In a question asking how scientific techniques and medical development are influenced by the animal testing, 73.8 percent of respondents answered the testing influenced the development of the scientific techniques and medical skills above the average level.      
82.5 percent agreed with animal testing. 43.7 percent of the respondents answered that the reason they agree to animal testing is its contribution to the development of scientific techniques and medical skills. Looking at these data together, the statistics show that Hanyangians think that animal testing is one of the important processes of the scientific development.
   Meanwhile, 17.5 percent of respondents answered they have an opposite opinion on the experiment. 64.7 percent of the respondents responded that such testing is a behavior degrading the dignity of life. Also, 14.7 percent of them answered that testing is not beneficial to neither humans nor animals. 
Considering matters that should be taken in consideration of animal testing, there was a different opinion between the advocates and opponents. While 40.6 percent of the advocates answered that enhancing and strengthening scientists?ethics is the most important matter, 29.4 of opponents thought the matter of ethics is important. Meanwhile, 32.3 percent of the opponent respondents chose the matter of using minimum scale of animals. The clause which showed the largest gap between advocates and opponents is developing testing methods which can minimize animals?pain. While 29.4 percents of opponents choose this clause, only 2.6 percent of advocates choose it.
   In the society, some movements and resolution for solving arguments are enacted for solving the problems that Hanyangians identify. Articles of law related with animal testing have continuously been amended, and researchers and scientists enhance their ethics through their annual memorial events.
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn 뒤로가기 위로가기
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
자동등록방지용 코드를 입력하세요!   
- 200자까지 쓰실 수 있습니다. (현재 0 byte / 최대 400byte)
- 욕설등 인신공격성 글은 삭제 합니다. [운영원칙]
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
School Violence, Reaching Beyond the School Walls
Students’ Right to Education: Well-Reflected Through Online Learning Services?
Beware of the Orange Warning: Anyone Could Be a Victim of Messenger Phishing
Listen to the Superheroes: What Superpowers Do You Want to Have?
The Stalking Punishment Act: A 22-Year Step Forward
A Way of Making Every Day Count: The Miracle Morning
Find a Bookstore that Suits Your Taste
Hanyang University’s First MUN: The Start of a New Chapter
Go Away COVID-19! The Hanyang Goblins Are Here!
Making Mobility Easy: How One of Our Very Own Became the CEO of a Mobility Startup
About HJSubscriptionTo HJFree BoardContact UsPrivacy PolicyYouth Protection Policy
Executive Editor Professor Yun Seong-won | Editor-in-Chief Lee Jung-joo Youth Protection Officer : Lee Jung-joo
Seoul Campus, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Rep. of KOREA | Tel_02 2220 4774
Ansan Campus, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan Kyeonggi-do, 426-791, Korea
Copyright © 2007 The Hanyang Journal. All rights reserved.