> Photo > Focus
Continuous Conflicts Between the Taxi Industry and the Ride Platforms
Park Hee-ju  |  park1106@hanyang.ac.kr
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
[343호] 승인 2019.09.02  
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn

As society develops, the increase in product variety has given more freedom to what customers choose to consume. Recently, shared services such as Mo-bike, Socar and Seoul bike have been trendy items. Among them, the car sharing services have attracted the public’s attention, and vari- ous ride platforms have begun to emerge based on this trend. Uber and Kakao Taxi are the most well-known examples of the newly introduced platforms. However, they initially faced strong opposition from the taxi industry. Taxi drivers have complained about their diminishing revenues. The conflicts between ride platforms and taxi industries are worsening daily. In one extreme case, a taxi driver committed suicide by setting himself on fire in his own taxi. Controversy over ride-sharing between Kakao and the taxi industry seems to be concluding with ride-sharing being allowed during rush hour.

However, the battle between the taxi industry and the mobility industry is shifting to another shared car service, ‘Tada’. While Kakao Mobility worked quickly with the taxi industry after the Land, Infrastructure, and Transport Ministryʼs “Taxi System Reorganization Plan” was introduced, the mobility service of rental cars like ‘Tada’ is still facing strong opposition from taxi organizations. On August 7, 2019, four taxi organizations issued a statement calling for the immediate punishment of illegal taxi businesses using similar-looking rental cars, including ‘Tada’. The taxi industry has complained that ‘Tada’ has been operating illegal taxies, and has broken away from the legislative plan to provide convenient ride services to tourist groups.

Watching the conflict, consumers have criticized the taxi industry’s response. They claim that taxi drivers need to improve their unfriendly manners and safety issues first before criticizing the emergence of other competitors, since it is completely logical that consumers would take advantage of better services when offered. In order to prevent confusion, the government will have to come up with an organized system, instead of an ambiguous sanction on ride-sharing services. Furthermore, the platforming of the mobility industry is causing serious labor problems. For example, unequal contracts with platform owners and long-term labor issues below minimum wage are causing strikes by Uber drivers in New York. Protecting taxi driversʼ means of living and promising customersʼ rights should not be taken lightly when solving these problems.

폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 요즘 네이버 구글 msn 뒤로가기 위로가기
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
자동등록방지용 코드를 입력하세요!   
- 200자까지 쓰실 수 있습니다. (현재 0 byte / 최대 400byte)
- 욕설등 인신공격성 글은 삭제 합니다. [운영원칙]
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
School Violence, Reaching Beyond the School Walls
Students’ Right to Education: Well-Reflected Through Online Learning Services?
Beware of the Orange Warning: Anyone Could Be a Victim of Messenger Phishing
Listen to the Superheroes: What Superpowers Do You Want to Have?
The Stalking Punishment Act: A 22-Year Step Forward
A Way of Making Every Day Count: The Miracle Morning
Find a Bookstore that Suits Your Taste
Hanyang University’s First MUN: The Start of a New Chapter
Go Away COVID-19! The Hanyang Goblins Are Here!
Making Mobility Easy: How One of Our Very Own Became the CEO of a Mobility Startup
About HJSubscriptionTo HJFree BoardContact UsPrivacy PolicyYouth Protection Policy
Executive Editor Professor Yun Seong-won | Editor-in-Chief Lee Jung-joo Youth Protection Officer : Lee Jung-joo
Seoul Campus, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Rep. of KOREA | Tel_02 2220 4774
Ansan Campus, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan Kyeonggi-do, 426-791, Korea
Copyright © 2007 The Hanyang Journal. All rights reserved.